Understanding what criminal intent is by definition makes it immediately
evident why it is such an important determinant in the justice system.
The "criminal act” is the
definition purported by thelawdictionary.org.
An example this source gives is
the “intent to deprive
or defraud the true owner of
his property.”
In the justice system, it may
not always be easy for a judge or jury to determine whether or not there is or
has been actual criminal intent behind a crime that has been committed. There
is always the possibility of “spontaneous action.”
Addressing the question of
criminality is seldom easy. Criminal intent is an important determinant in the
justice system because reprimand and punishment serve as deterrents, or at
least they should serve as deterrents, even though in the justice system, it
does not always seem to work that way.
Every human being has the
expectation of justice rendered to him or her in terms of compassion, care and
community. Even the most hardened criminals who have committed heinous crimes
need compassion. It is not as if there are global hard-fast rules with any
guarantees of compassion.
One might ask whether criminals
who receive reprimands or punishment in conjunction with compassion continue in
their crime.
Is their crime the result of
non-compassion in their lives?
Is compassion or the lack
thereof behind criminal intent?
Criminal intent becomes an
individual matter assessed by a judge or jury. No two criminal cases are
identical, simply because no two individuals have the same thought processes
regarding their intent.
The word “aim or purpose” according to
the free dictionary.com suggests that this depends upon whether that intent
includes direct or oblique intent.
The burden of proof with
respect to criminal intent becomes the responsibility of a person charged with
breaking the law or committing a crime. The degree of reprimand or punishment
for a crime depends on whether it is possible to obtain
proof.
Ideally, reprimands and
punishment meted out by the justice system are fair, but in a less than ideal world,
fairness often becomes somewhat of an ideal. In other words, there are
situations in which reprimand and punishment do not fit the crime. Ideally,
criminal intent should be the determining factor, but dealing with ideals can
leave a lot of room for error or misjudgments in the justice system.
Justice is a process that is
continually subject to change and revision, and rightly so.
No comments:
Post a Comment